科研之友
微信
新浪微博
Facebook
分享链接
摘要
The global atmospheric energy cycle is estimated on an annual basis using Reanalysis 2 data front the National Centers for Environmental Prediction and National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR), and ERA 40 Reanalyses from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) for the period 1979-2001. A formalism to avoid belowground data on pressure levels intercepted by topography is adopted. No appreciable differences were found between the two datasets from the energetics point of view. The so-called w alpha and u.grad 7 formulations were both Used for the conversions from zonal available potential energy into zonal kinetic energy (C(Z)) and from eddy available potential energy into eddy kinetic energy (C(E)). Results with both formulations are comparable only when using the formalism preventing belowground data to enter into the computations. Atmospheric energetics are also computed using ECMWF Reanalyses for the period 1958-1978. A significant increase was found in the eddy kinetic and eddy available potential energies from the early period to the later period, likely related to the assimilation in the reanalyses of satellite data after 1979. The conversion rate, C(Z), was found to change its sign throughout the years. The atmospheric energy cycle using the ECMWF Reanalyses data is compared with five previous estimates. Differences in the direction of the conversion rate, C(Z), between the various estimates may be explained by the different time periods chosen for averaging. Owing to the omission of belowground. data, the conversion from zonal available potential energy into eddy available potential energy (C(A)) was somewhat smaller in ECMWF Reanalyses than in the previous estimates. Despite those differences, an overall agreement may be found between the various estimates for the atmospheric energy cycle.
- 出版日期2009-2
