Dynamic mechanistic explanation: computational modeling of circadian rhythms as an exemplar for cognitive science

作者：Bechtel William^*; Abrahamsen Adele

来源：Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 2010, 41(3): 321-333.

DOI：10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.07.003

• Circadian rhythms
• Computational models
• Cognitive science
• Mechanistic models
• Oscillators
• Dynamic models
• Explanation

We consider computational modeling in two fields: chronobiology and cognitive science. In circadian rhythm models, variables generally correspond to properties of parts and operations of the responsible mechanism. A computational model of this complex mechanism is grounded in empirical discoveries and contributes a more refined understanding of the dynamics of its behavior. In cognitive science, on the other hand, computational modelers typically advance de novo proposals for mechanisms to account for behavior. They offer indirect evidence that a proposed mechanism is adequate to produce particular behavioral data, but typically there is no direct empirical evidence for the hypothesized parts and operations. Models in these two fields differ in the extent of their empirical grounding, but they share the goal of achieving dynamic mechanistic explanation. That is, they augment a proposed mechanistic explanation with a computational model that enables exploration of the mechanism's dynamics. Using exemplars from circadian rhythm research, we extract six specific contributions provided by computational models. We then examine cognitive science models to determine how well they make the same types of contributions. We suggest that the modeling approach used in circadian research may prove useful in cognitive science as researchers develop procedures for experimentally decomposing cognitive mechanisms into parts and operations and begin to understand their nonlinear interactions.

• 出版日期2010-9