A comparison of two techniques of uterine closure in caesarean section

作者：Kostu Bulent; Ercan Onder; Ozer Alev^*; Bakacak Murat; Ozdemir Ozgur; Avci Fazil

来源：Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 2016, 29(10): 1573-1576.

DOI：10.3109/14767058.2015.1054276

• Assistant surgeon
• uterine closure
• caesarean

Objective: To compare the results of two different techniques of uterine closure in caesarean section operations in which assistant surgeons participated.
Methods: A total of 765 patients were separated into two groups.In Group1(n = 380), the assistant surgeon, while pulling the suture in a caudal direction with the left hand, held the uterine wall from the joined site with the right hand to prevent upward tension of tissue. In Group 2 (n = 385), the suture was placed by the assistant surgeon by pulling it in the cephalic direction with the right hand. These two techniques were evaluated in respect of the postoperative decrease in haemoglobin level ,the need for additional sutures and operative outcomes.
Results: The need for additional sutures was determined as statistically high in Group 2 at mean 0.5 +/- 0.6 compared to mean 0.2 +/- 0.5 in Group1 (p < 0.001). The mean operating time was determined as statistically significantly longer in Group 2 (Group1, 38.0 +/- 5.6 mins and Group2, 41.3 +/- 4.3 mins) (p < 0.001). The postoperative decrease in hb was statistically significantly greater in Group 2 (Group1, 1.1 +/- 0.4, Group2, 1.2 +/- 0.4) (p = 0.002).
Conclusion: The cephalic direction placement of the suture with the right hand of the assistant surgeon in uterine closure leads to bleeding due to tissue cuts in the lower wound lip and thereby creating a need for additional sutures. Therefore, the suture should be placed in a caudal direction with the left hand.

• 出版日期2016-5-18