A dosimetric comparative study: Volumetric modulated arc therapy vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of nasal cavity carcinomas

作者：Kham Nguyen^*; Cummings David; Lanza Vincent C; Morris Kathleen; Wang Congjun; Sutton Jordan; Garcia John

来源：Medical Dosimetry, 2013, 38(3): 225-232.

DOI：10.1016/j.meddos.2013.01.006

• VMAT
• 3-Arc
• IMRT
• Nasal cavity carcinomas

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences between volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of nasal cavity carcinomas. The treatment of 10 patients, who had completed IMRT treatment for resected tumors of the nasal cavity, was replanned with the Philips Pinnacle(3) Version 9 treatment-planning system. The IMRT plans used a 9-beam technique whereas the VMAT (known as SmartArc) plans used a 3-arc technique. Both types of plans were optimized using Philips Pinnacle(3) Direct Machine Parameter Optimization algorithm. IMRT and VMAT plans%26apos; quality was compared by evaluating the maximum, minimum, and mean doses to the target volumes and organs at risk, monitor units (MUs), and the treatment delivery time. Our results indicate that VMAT is capable of greatly reducing treatment delivery time and MUs compared with IMRT. The reduction of treatment delivery time and MUs can decrease the effects of intrafractional uncertainties that can occur because of patient movement during treatment delivery. VMAT%26apos;s plans further reduce doses to critical structures that are in close proximity to the target volume.

• 出版日期2013