摘要
OBJECTIVE %26lt;br%26gt;To evaluate the value of nuclear matrix protein-22 (NMP22) in bladder cancer (BC) screening, and its effect on variables in a prospective study in a high-risk population. %26lt;br%26gt;PATIENTS AND METHODS %26lt;br%26gt;A total of 1772 chemical workers (mean age 62 years) exposed to carcinogenic aromatic amines were enrolled in the study. %26lt;br%26gt;In all, 7091 screening check-ups in 1609 subjects were performed. %26lt;br%26gt;Urine samples were collected for a quantitative NMP22 immunoassay, urine analysis and creatinine concentration assessment. %26lt;br%26gt;Cystoscopy and subsequent transurethral resection were performed where there were suspicious findings. %26lt;br%26gt;RESULTS %26lt;br%26gt;Histopathological analysis found three papillary urothelial neoplasms of low malignant potential, five recurrent BCs and 13 primary BCs. Three tumours were at a muscle-invasive stage (pT2, pT3a or pT3b). %26lt;br%26gt;We found higher NMP22 concentrations (%26gt; 10 U/mL) in 224 patients, which correctly predicted BC in six cases (sensitivity 97.29%, specificity 28.57%; negative predictive value 99.04%, positive predictive value 12.24%). %26lt;br%26gt;Gross haematuria affected NMP22 results (odd ratio [OR] 3.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.81-6.73). Infection also affected NMP22 results (OR 4.13, 95% CI 2.31-7.35). %26lt;br%26gt;NMP22 was more frequently positive in urine with creatinine concentration %26gt; 2.5 g/L (OR 1.61, 95% CI 0.91-2.86). %26lt;br%26gt;CONCLUSIONS %26lt;br%26gt;NMP22 outcomes are affected by haematuria, infection and concentrated urine. %26lt;br%26gt;NMP22 alone cannot be recommended for primary screening in a high-risk population nor as an alternative to cystoscopy during follow-up. %26lt;br%26gt;A NMP22 test might be a useful adjunct to urine cytology.
- 出版日期2012-9