A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery

作者：Tam Michael S; Kaoutzanis Christodoulos; Mullard Andrew J; Regenbogen Scott E; Franz Michael G; Hendren Samantha; Krapohl Greta; Vandewarker James F; Lampman Richard M; Cleary Robert K^*

来源：Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 2016, 30(2): 455-463.

DOI：10.1007/s00464-015-4218-6

• Laparoscopic colorectal surgery
• Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery
• Robotic colorectal surgery
• Conversion rates
• Complication rates
• Length of hospital stay

Current data addressing the role of robotic surgery for the management of colorectal disease are primarily from single-institution and case-matched comparative studies as well as administrative database analyses. The purpose of this study was to compare minimally invasive surgery outcomes using a large regional protocol-driven database devoted to surgical quality, improvement in patient outcomes, and cost-effectiveness.
This is a retrospective cohort study from the prospectively collected Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative registry designed to compare outcomes of patients who underwent elective laparoscopic, hand-assisted laparoscopic, and robotic colon and rectal operations between July 1, 2012 and October 7, 2014. We adjusted for differences in baseline covariates between cases with different surgical approaches using propensity score quintiles modeled on patient demographics, general health factors, diagnosis, and preoperative co-morbidities. The primary outcomes were conversion rates and hospital length of stay. Secondary outcomes included operative time, and postoperative morbidity and mortality.
A total of 2735 minimally invasive colorectal operations met inclusion criteria. Conversion rates were lower with robotic as compared to laparoscopic operations, and this was statistically significant for rectal resections (colon 9.0 vs. 16.9 %, p < 0.06; rectum 7.8 vs. 21.2 %, p < 0.001). The adjusted length of stay for robotic colon operations (4.00 days, 95 % CI 3.63-4.40) was significantly shorter compared to laparoscopic (4.41 days, 95 % CI 4.17-4.66; p = 0.04) and hand-assisted laparoscopic cases (4.44 days, 95 % CI 4.13-4.78; p = 0.008). There were no significant differences in overall postoperative complications among groups.
When compared to conventional laparoscopy, the robotic platform is associated with significantly fewer conversions to open for rectal operations, and significantly shorter length of hospital stay for colon operations, without increasing overall postoperative morbidity. These findings and the recent upgrades in minimally invasive technology warrant continued evaluation of the role of the robotic platform in colorectal surgery.

• 出版日期2016-2