Athletes' self-regulatory responses to unattainable athletic goals: Effects of need-supportive vs. need-thwarting coaching and athletes' motivation

作者：Mulvihill Kathryn^*; Guilmette Maude; Barker Erin T.; Bianco Theresa

来源：International Journal of Sport Psychology, 2018, 49(3): 179-200.

DOI：10.7352/IJSP.2018.49.179

• Athletes
• Coaching
• Goal adjustment theory
• Self-determination theory

Athletes are celebrated for their ability to persevere in the pursuit of goals. Just as important, however, is the ability to deal effectively with failure and disappointment. Goal adjustment theory (GAT; Wrosch, Scheier, Carver, & Schulz, 2003a; Wrosch, Scheier, & Miller, 2013) specifies that when goals are unattainable disengagement - withdrawing effort and psychological commitment and - reengagement - beginning to pursue new goals - are adaptive responses that protect health and wellbeing. Building on two recent studies (Ntoumanis, Healy, Sedikides, Smith, & Duda, 2014; Smith & Ntoumanis, 2014), we examined whether need - supportive vs. thwarting social contexts and autonomous vs. controlled motivation, two constructs central to self-determination theory (SDT; Ryan &Deci, 2017), could help to explain goal adjustment responses in a sample of athletes. Results replicated the potentially controversial finding that athletes' autonomous motivation was negatively associated with ease of disengagement and underscored the importance of coaching behaviors for athletes' motivation and goal adjustment.

• 出版日期2018-6