Muscle oxygenation of vastus lateralis and medialis muscles during alternating and pulsed current electrical stimulation

作者：Aldayel Abdulaziz^*; Muthalib Makii; Jubeau Marc; McGuigan Michael; Nosaka Kazunori

来源：European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2011, 111(5): 779-787.

DOI：10.1007/s00421-010-1699-9

• Neuromuscular electrical stimulation
• Near-infrared spectroscopy
• Blood flow
• Fatigue
• Motor unit recruitment
• Isometric contractions

This study compared between alternating and pulsed current electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) for muscle oxygenation and blood volume during isometric contractions. Nine healthy men (23-48 years) received alternating current EMS (2500 Hz) modulated at 75 Hz on the knee extensors of one leg, and pulsed current EMS (75 Hz) for the other leg separated by 2 weeks in a randomised, counter-balanced order. Pulse duration (400 mu s), on-off ratio (5-15 s) and other stimulation parameters were matched between conditions and 30 isometric contractions were induced at the knee joint angle of 100A degrees (0A degrees full extension). Changes in tissue oxygenation index (a dagger TOI) and total hemoglobin volume (a dagger tHb) of vastus lateralis and medialis muscles over 30 contractions were assessed by a near-infrared spectroscopy, and were compared between conditions by a two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Peak torque produced during EMS increased over 30 contractions in response to the increase in the stimulation intensity for pulsed current, but not for the alternating current EMS. The torque during each isometric contraction was less stable in alternating than pulsed current EMS. The changes in a dagger TOI amplitude during relaxation phases and a dagger tHb amplitude were not significantly different between conditions. However, the decreases in a dagger TOI amplitude during contraction phases from baseline were significantly (P < 0.05) greater for the pulsed current than alternating current from the 18th contraction (-15.6 +/- A 2.3 vs. -8.9 +/- A 1.8%) to 30th contraction (-10.7 +/- A 1.8 vs. -4.8 +/- A 1.5%). These results suggest that the muscles were less activated in the alternating current EMS when compared with the pulsed current EMS.

• 出版日期2011-5