Atmospheric Aerosol over a Southeastern Region of Texas: Chemical Composition and Possible Sources

作者：Chiou Paul^*; Tang Wei; Lin Che Jen; Chu Hsing Wei; Ho T C

来源：Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 2009, 14(3): 333-350.

DOI：10.1007/s10666-007-9120-8

• Airborne particulate matter
• PM
• Positive matrix factorization
• Receptor modeling
• Factor contribution
• Factor profiles

Speciated samples of PM(2.5) were collected at a site in Jefferson County, Texas by US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) from July of 2003 to August of 2005. A total of 269 samples with 52 species were measured; however, 22 species were excluded in this study because of too many below-detection-limit data. The data set was analyzed by positive matrix factorization (PMF) to infer the sources of PM observed at the site. The analysis identified ten sources: sulfate-rich secondary aerosol I (35.9%), sulfate-rich secondary aerosol II (21.0%), cement/carbon-rich (11.7%), wood smoke (8.8%), metal processing (6.3%), motor vehicle/road dust (5.7%), nitrate-rich secondary aerosol (3.3%), soil (3.2%), sea salt (2.6%), and chloride depleted marine aerosol (1.6%). Sulfate and nitrate mainly exist as salts. The two sulfate-rich secondary aerosols account for almost 57% of the PM(2.5) mass concentration. The factor containing highest concentrations of Cl and Na was attributed to sea salt due to the proximity of the monitoring site to the Gulf of Mexico. The chloride depleted marine aerosol was related to the sea salt aerosol. Cement/carbon-rich, wood smoke, metal processing, and motor vehicle/road dust factor were likely to be the local sources.