科研之友
微信
新浪微博
Facebook
分享链接
摘要
An accurate method to determine contact angles (CA) of soils as a measure of water repellency is still missing In the present research, we evaluated and compared different methods to determine the CA of dry soil samples Experiments were made by using a set of porous materials (slit, sand and glass beads) with different levels of water repellency. The CAs were measured with the Capillary Rise Method (theta(CRM), liquid penetration into a 3-d system), the Wilhelmy plate method (theta(WPM); measurement of capillary forces acting on a plane sample) and the Sessile Drop Method (theta(SDM), optical CA analysis of chop Contour oil a plane sample) Results were compared with the CAs calculated from capillary rise in long vertical columns (theta(CR)(E)), where liquid profiles of the final capillary rise of water and ethanol, respectively, were used to derive the contact angle under the assumed equilibrium conditions The results showed the overestimation of the CA by using the well established bi-liquid CRM technique for porous materials, in particular for material with a low degree of water repellency (CA < 401) and for the finer textured materials In contrast, a variant of the Wilhelmy plate method, i e. the cosine-averaged advancing CA and receding CA (theta(WPM)(E)), as well as the Sessile Drop CA, theta(SDM), were close to the ones of OCR. We Concluded that theta(WPM)(E) and theta(SDM) are apparent CA, but nevertheless able to predict the impact of wettability on the final capillary rise which is affected by pore topology as well as by wettability.
- 出版日期2010-3-1
