科研之友
微信
新浪微博
Facebook
分享链接
摘要
The hypothesis of no significant difference in errors between observed (historical) and downscaled global circulation model (GCM) rainfall and corresponding errors in simulated runoff was tested. The percentage difference in mean and standard deviation, normalized errors and normalized bias metrics were used. The ACRU hydrological model was used to simulate runoff. Results indicated that errors in rainfall lead to amplified errors in simulated runoff. A 10% error magnitude in mean rainfall was amplified three times in mean runoff. Rainfall variability was amplified by twice as much from rainfall to simulated runoff. These findings indicate that uncertainty in input downscaled rainfall is amplified in simulated runoff, hence the quality of input rainfall is a strong determining factor of the simulated runoff. Ultimately, there is a need for continuous improvement in the GCM downscaling process, particularly model process description, so as to minimize uncertainties due to GCM model description.
- 出版日期2017
