High-pitch Helical Dual-source Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography Comparing Image Quality in Inspiratory Breath-hold and During Free Breathing

作者：Ajlan Amr M; Binzaqr Salma^*; Jadkarim Dalia A; Jamjoom Lamia G; Leipsic Jonathon

来源：Journal of Thoracic Imaging, 2016, 31(1): 56-62.

DOI：10.1097/RTI.0000000000000173

• breath-holding
• pulmonary embolism
• computed tomography
• pulmonary embolism
• high pitch
• multidetector-row computed tomography
• helical
• free breathing

Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to compare qualitative and quantitative image parameters of dual-source high-pitch helical computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in breath-holding (BH) versus free-breathing (FB) patients.
Materials and Methods:
Ninety-nine consented patients (61 female individuals; mean age +/- SD, 49 +/- 18.7 y) were randomized into BH (n=45) versus FB (n=54) high-pitch helical CTPA. Patient characteristics and CTPA radiation doses were analyzed. Two readers assessed for pulmonary embolism (PE), transient interruption of contrast, and respiratory and cardiac motion. The readers used a subjective 3-point scale to rate the pulmonary artery opacification and lung parenchymal appearance. A single reader assessed mean pulmonary artery signal intensity, noise, contrast, signal to noise ratio, and contrast to noise ratio.
Results:
PE was diagnosed in 16% BH and 19% FB patients. CTPAs of both groups were of excellent or acceptable quality for PE evaluation and of similar mean radiation doses (1.3 mSv). Transient interruption of contrast was seen in 5/45 (11%) BH and 5/54 (9%) FB patients (not statistically significant, P=0.54). No statistically significant difference was noted in cardiac, diaphragmatic, and lung parenchymal motion. Lung parenchymal assessment was excellent in all cases, except for 5/54 (9%) motion-affected FB cases with acceptable quality (statistically significant, P=0.03). No CTPA was considered nondiagnostic by any of the readers. No objective image quality differences were noted between both groups (P > 0.05).
Conclusions:
High-pitch helical CTPA acquired during BH or in FB yields comparable image quality for the diagnosis of PE and lung pathology, with low radiation exposure. Only a modest increase in lung parenchymal artifacts is encountered in FB high-pitch helical CTPA.

• 出版日期2016-1