Brain Metastasis Prediction by Transcriptomic Profiling in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

作者:Duchnowska Renata*; Jarzab Michal; Zebracka Gala Jadwiga; Matkowski Rafal; Kowalczyk Anna; Radecka Barbara; Kowalska Malgorzata; Pfeifer Aleksandra; Foszczynska Kloda Malgorzata; Musolino Antonino; Czartoryska Arlukowicz Bogumila; Litwiniuk Maria; Surus Hyla Anna; Szablowska Siwik Sylwia; Karczmarek Borowska Bozenna; Debska Szmich Sylwia; Glodek Sutek Beata; Sosinska Mielcarek Katarzyna; Chmielowska Ewa; Kalinka Warzocha Ewa; Olszewski Wojciech P; Patera Janusz
来源:Clinical Breast Cancer, 2017, 17(2): E65-E75.
DOI:10.1016/j.clbc.2016.08.008

摘要

We investigated expression of 29,369 gene transcripts in primary tumor samples from 119 patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer to identify genes with different expression between patients with and without brain metastases (BM). Our results indicate that analysis based on expression of gene transcripts from primary tumor does not allow prediction of BM development in this population. Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacks expression of steroid hormone receptors (estrogen receptor a and progesterone) and epidermal growth factor receptor type 2. This phenotype shows high metastatic potential, with particular predilection to lungs and brain. Determination of TNBC transcriptomic profiles associated with high risk of brain metastasis (BM) might identify patients requiring alternative, more aggressive, or specific preventive and therapeutic approaches. Patients and Methods: Using a cDNA-mediated annealing, selection, extension, and ligation assay, we investigated expression of 29,369 gene transcripts in primary TNBC tumor samples from 119 patients-71 in discovery cohort A and 48 in independent cohort B-that included best discriminating genes. Expression of mRNA was correlated with the occurrence of symptomatic BM. Results: In cohort A, the difference at the noncorrected P < .005 was found for 64 transcripts (P = .23 for global test), but none showed significant difference at a preset level of false-discovery rate of < 10%. Of the 30 transcripts with the largest differences between patients with and without BM in cohort A, none was significantly associated with BM in cohort B. Conclusion: Analysis based on the primary tumor gene transcripts alone is unlikely to predict BM development in advanced TNBC. Despite its negative findings, the study adds to the knowledge on the biology of TNBC and paves the way for future projects using more advanced molecular assays.