Impact of Aortic Valve Replacement on Outcome of Symptomatic Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis With Low Gradient and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

作者：Ozkan Alper; Hachamovitch Rory; Kapadia Samir R; Tuzcu E Murat; Marwick Thomas H^*

来源：Circulation, 2013, 128(6): 622-631.

DOI：10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001094

• aortic stenosis
• aortic valve
• treatment outcome

Background
The optimal management of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (mean gradient <40 mm Hg, indexed aortic valve area 0.6 cm(2)/m(2)) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction remains controversial because gradients may be similar after aortic valve replacement (AVR). We compared outcomes of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with AVR or medical therapy.
Methods and Results
Comprehensive echocardiographic measurements including hemodynamic calculations were completed in 260 prospectively identified patients with symptomatic low-gradient severe aortic stenosis. Patients were followed up for mortality over 28 +/- 24 months. AVR was performed in 123 patients (47%). Compared with AVR patients, medically treated patients had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (25% versus 41%, P=0.009), lower stroke volume index (36.4 +/- 8.4 versus 34.4 +/- 8.7 mL/m(2), P=0.02), higher pulmonary artery pressure (38 +/- 11 versus 48 +/- 21 mm Hg, P=0.001), and higher creatinine level (1.1 +/- 0.4 versus 1.22 +/- 0.5 mg/dL, P=0.02). These and other clinically relevant variables were entered into a propensity model that reflected likelihood of referral to AVR. This score and other variables were entered into a Cox model to explore the independent effect of AVR on outcome. During follow-up, 105 patients died (40%): 32 (30%) in the AVR group and 73 (70%) in the medical treatment group. AVR (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.94; P<0.001) was independently associated with outcome and remained a strong predictor of survival after adjustment for propensity score. Medical therapy was associated with 2-fold greater all-cause mortality than AVR. The protective effect of AVR was similar in 125 patients with normal flow (stroke volume index >35 mL/m(2); P=0.22).
Conclusions
AVR is associated with better survival than medical therapy in patients with symptomatic low-gradient severe AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

• 出版日期2013-8-6