科研之友
微信
新浪微博
Facebook
分享链接
摘要
Estimation of stream fish abundance using removal electrofishing is common and allows sampling of fish populations during a single site visit. However, recent evaluations have demonstrated that removal estimators can substantially underestimate fish abundance, raising concerns about using this method. We evaluated removal estimates of trout (family Salmonidae) abundance using night electrofishing in 200-300-m reaches of 8 Rocky Mountain streams and analyzed the data using new methods in Program MARK to account for potential sources of bias. The removal estimates were validated using populations of previously captured and marked resident fish. Overall, removal estimates were accurate estimates of the number of marked fish in study reaches (mean bias, -2.4% [1 fish/reach]), and removal and mark-recapture estimates of total fish abundance also differed by less than 1 fish/reach on average. In general, capture probabilities were high (average = 97% over three passes), and removal estimates had narrow 95% confidence intervals that included the known number of marked fish for all but 1 of 17 estimates for three trout species. Capture probability increased with fish length and was greater on the first than on subsequent electrofishing passes. Capture probability also varied among sites, but this variation was not accounted for by any measured habitat variable. Finally, fish that had been previously marked were slightly more likely to be captured during electrofishing, even though the recovery periods for most fish exceeded 24 h. Simulations confirmed our finding that accounting for the heterogeneity in capture probability owing to individual fish size reduced the bias in removal estimates. Our results demonstrate that three-pass removal electrofishing can provide accurate estimates of fish abundance when field methods are designed to maximize capture probability and when modern analytical tools are used to account for the heterogeneity in capture probability.
- 出版日期2011
