A matched cohort comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: Evaluating perioperative outcomes

作者：Upadhyayula Pavan S; Yue John K; Curtis Erik I; Hoshide Reid; Ciacci Joseph D^*

来源：Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 2017, 43: 235-239.

DOI：10.1016/j.jocn.2017.04.027

• ACDF
• ACS-NSQIP
• CDA
• Cervical spine
• Spine surgery
• Operation time

Objective: Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is a recent alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients suffering cervical disc herniation and degeneration. To date, a systematic analysis of their comparative advantages and risks following elective surgery remains elusive.
Methods: Adult patients undergoing elective CDA or ACDF were extracted from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database years 2011-2014. A total of 19,369 patients were matched 1:1 by age, sex, functional status, charlson comorbidity index, ASA classification, BMI classification, and number of vertebral levels operated on during surgery. This matching process led to a final sample of 588 subjects (294 CDA, 294 ACDF). Multivariable regression was performed for five outcome measures: operation time, early complications, reoperation rates, hospital length of stay (HLOS), and discharge destination. Mean differences (B), odds ratios (OR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported.
Results: Compared to ACDF, CDA was associated with decreased mean operation time (B = -18.78-min, 95% CI [-29.13, -8.42]; p < 0.001), decreased HLOS (B = -0.44-days [-0.77, -0.11]; p = 0.009), and increased likelihood of discharge to home (OR = 5.39 [1.14-25.43]; p = 0.033). No differences in reoperation rates and complications were found.
Conclusion: In a matched cohort analysis, CDA performs comparably to ACDF and is associated with decreased operation time and HLOS, and increased likelihood of discharge to home, without differences in 30-day complications or reoperation rates. Future prospective studies are warranted. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

• 出版日期2017-9