Assessing the maturity of a research area: bibliometric review and proposed framework

作者：Keathley Herring Heather; Van Aken Eileen; Gonzalez Aleu Fernando; Deschamps Fernando; Letens Geert; Orlandini Pablo Cardenas

来源：Scientometrics, 2016, 109(2): 927-951.

DOI：10.1007/s11192-016-2096-x

• Research area
• Maturity
• Systematic literature review
• Conceptual framework
• Bibliometric analysis

In recent years, many disciplines have begun to adopt more systematic and standardized approaches to evaluate the impact and development of a research area with a stronger emphasis on quantitative techniques. In particular, identifying and analyzing the published literature have become important exercises for many disciplines and methods such as systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis have become more regularly used to obtain a deeper understanding of a research area. One concept that is of particular interest is the maturity, or level of development, of a research area. While this concept has been mentioned in many works, it has not yet been formalized, resulting in a lack of consensus concerning the definition of research area maturity and analysis techniques to assess maturity. Therefore, most assessments of research area maturity consider only a subset of the possible criteria with significant differences in the metrics and analyses used among different disciplines. Due to the inconsistencies in the definition and assessment of this concept, a comprehensive synthesis of this literature area is needed. This paper presents the results of a study to identify and analyze the literature, define the maturity of a research area, and synthesize the criteria for assessing maturity. The results are used to develop a generalized maturity assessment framework that establishes a comprehensive set of criteria, which can be adapted for use across a variety of research areas.

• 出版日期2016-11