摘要

During the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Solid Precipitation Intercomparison Experiment (SPICE), automated measurements of snow water equivalent (SWE) were made at the Sodankyla (Finland), Weissfluhjoch (Switzerland) and Caribou Creek (Canada) SPICE sites during the northern hemispheric winters of 2013/14 and 2014/15. Supplementary intercomparison measurements were made at Fortress Mountain (Kananaskis, Canada) during the 2013/14 winter. The objectives of this analysis are to compare automated SWE measurements with a reference, comment on their performance and, where possible, to make recommendations on how to best use the instruments and interpret their measurements. Sodankyla, Caribou Creek and Fortress Mountain hosted a Campbell Scientific CS725 passive gamma radiation SWE sensor. Sodankyla and Weissfluhjoch hosted a Sommer Messtechnik SSG1000 snow scale. The CS725 operating principle is based on measuring the attenuation of soil emitted gamma radiation by the snowpack and relating the attenuation to SWE. The SSG1000 measures the mass of the overlying snowpack directly by using a weighing platform and load cell. Manual SWE measurements were obtained at the intercomparison sites on a bi-weekly basis over the accumulation-ablation periods using bulk density samplers. These manual measurements are considered to be the reference for the intercomparison. Results from Sodankyla and Caribou Creek showed that the CS725 generally overestimates SWE as compared to manual measurements by roughly 30-35% with correlations (r(2)) as high as 0.99 for Sodankyla and 0.90 for Caribou Creek. The RMSE varied from 30 to 43mm water equivalent (mm w.e.) and from 18 to 25mm w.e. at Sodankyla and Caribou Creek, which had respective SWE maximums of approximately 200 and 120mm w.e. The correlation at Fortress Mountain was 0.94 (RMSE of 48mm w.e. with a maximum SWE of approximately 650mm w.e.) with no systematic overestimation. The SSG1000 snow scale, having a different measurement principle, agreed quite closely with the manual measurements at Sodankyla and Weissfluhjoch throughout the periods when data were available (r(2) as high as 0.99 and RMSE from 8 to 24mm w.e. at Sodankyla and from 56 to 59mm w.e. at Weissfluhjoch, where maximum SWE was approximately 850mm w.e.). When the SSG1000 was compared to the CS725 at Sodankyla, the agreement was linear until the start of ablation when the positive bias in the CS725 increases substantially relative to the SSG1000. Since both Caribou Creek and Sodankyla have sandy soil, water from the snowpack readily infiltrates into the soil during melt, even if the soil is frozen. However, the CS725 does not differentiate this water from the unmelted snow. This issue can be identified, at least during the late spring ablation period, with soil moisture and temperature observations like those measured at Caribou Creek. With a less permeable soil and surface runoff, the increase in the instrument bias during ablation is not as significant, as shown by the Fortress Mountain intercomparison.

  • 出版日期2017-1-16
  • 单位Saskatchewan; Saskatoon