Neurocognitive profiles of marginally housed persons with comorbid substance dependence, viral infection, and psychiatric illness

作者：Gicas Kristina M; Vila Rodriguez Fidel; Paquet Karine; Barr Alasdair M; Procyshyn Ric M; Lang Donna J; Smith Geoffrey N; Baitz Heather A; Gie**recht Chantelle J; Montaner Julio S; Krajden Mel; Krausz Michael; MacEwan G William; Panenka William J; Honer William G; Thornton Allen E^*

来源：Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 2014, 36(10): 1009-1022.

DOI：10.1080/13803395.2014.963519

• Dual diagnosis
• Neurocognition
• Substandard housing
• Substance-related disorders
• Cluster analysis

Introduction: Individuals living in single-room occupancy (SRO) hotels constitute a socially marginalized group with exposure to multiple factors with adverse effects on neurocognition, including substance use, viral infection, psychiatric illness, and brain injury. Consequently, marked heterogeneity in neurocognitive functioning is observed. This study aimed to identify and describe distinct neurocognitive profiles within a marginally housed sample. Method: Two hundred and forty-nine (N = 249) SRO hotel residents (mean age = 43.5 years) were recruited. A battery of tests assessed neurocognition across six domains: premorbid IQ, verbal memory, attention, inhibition, mental flexibility, and decision making. Clinical examinations collected information pertaining to substance use and psychiatric diagnoses, viral infection, psychiatric symptoms, risk behaviors, and everyday functioning. Cluster analysis was used to identify subgroups of individuals with similar neurocognitive profiles and was supplemented with a discriminant function analysis. Analyses of variance and chi-square tests were used to validate the derived clusters on key clinical and functional variables. Results: A three-cluster solution was found to be optimal. Cluster 1 (n = 59) presented as overall higher functioning, whereas Cluster 3 (n = 87) exhibited overall lower functioning with a relative strength in decision-making skills. Cluster 2 (n = 103) was characterized by neurocognitive abilities that generally bisected the performance of the other groups, but with a relative weakness in decision-making skills. Discriminant function analysis indicated the six neurocognitive variables comprised two underlying dimensions that accounted for between-group variance. Clusters meaningfully differed on demographics, substance use, viral exposure, psychiatric symptoms, neurological soft signs, and risk behavior. Conclusion: Neurocognitive functioning provides the basis for identifying meaningful subgroups of marginally housed individuals, which can be reliably differentiated on key variables. This approach facilitates an understanding of the neurocognitive dysfunction and associated vulnerabilities of marginalized persons and ultimately may elucidate intervention targets.

• 出版日期2014-11-26