Acute Esophagus Toxicity in Lung Cancer Patients After Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Concurrent Chemotherapy

作者：Kwint Margriet; Uyterlinde Wilma; Nijkamp Jasper; Chen Chun; de Bois Josien; Sonke Jan Jakob; van den Heuvel Michel; Knegjens Joost; van Herk Marcel; Belderbos Jose^*

来源：International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2012, 84(2): E223-E228.

DOI：10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.027

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the dose-effect relation between acute esophageal toxicity (AET) and the dose-volume parameters of the esophagus after intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Patients and Methods: One hundred thirty-nine patients with inoperable NSCLC treated with IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy were prospectively analyzed. The fractionation scheme was 66 Gy in 24 fractions. All patients received concurrently a daily dose of cisplatin (6 mg/m(2)). Maximum AET was scored according to Common Toxicity Criteria 3.0. Dose-volume parameters V5 to V70, D-mean and D-max of the esophagus were calculated. A logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the dose-effect relation between these parameters and grade >= 2 and grade >= 3 AET. The outcome was compared with the clinically used esophagus V35 prediction model for grade >= 2 after radical 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) treatment.
Results: In our patient group, 9% did not experience AET, and 31% experienced grade 1 AET, 38% grade 2 AET, and 22% grade 3 AET. The incidence of grade 2 and grade 3 AET was not different from that in patients treated with CCRT using 3DCRT. The V50 turned out to be the most significant dosimetric predictor for grade >= 3 AET (P=.012). The derived V50 model was shown to predict grade >= 2 AET significantly better than the clinical V35 model (P<.001).
Conclusions: For NSCLC patients treated with IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy, the V50 was identified as most accurate predictor of grade >= 3 AET. There was no difference in the incidence of grade >= 2 AET between 3DCRT and IMRT in patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy.

• 出版日期2012-10-1