An EM-Based Method for Q-Matrix Validation

作者：Wang, Wenyi^*; Song, Lihong; Ding, Shuliang; Meng, Yaru; Cao, Canxi; Jie, Yongjing

来源：Applied Psychological Measurement, 2018, 42(6): 446-459.

DOI：10.1177/0146621617752991

• cognitive diagnosis
• Q-matrix
• EM algorithm
• DINA model
• reduced RUM
• fraction-subtraction data

With the purpose to assist the subject matter experts in specifying their Q-matrices, the authors used expectation-maximization (EM)-based algorithm to investigate three alternative Q-matrix validation methods, namely, the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), the marginal maximum likelihood estimation (MMLE), and the intersection and difference (ID) method. Their efficiency was compared, respectively, with that of the sequential EM-based method and its extension (sigma(2)), the method, and the nonparametric method in terms of correct recovery rate, true negative rate, and true positive rate under the deterministic-inputs, noisy and gate (DINA) model and the reduced reparameterized unified model (rRUM). Simulation results showed that for the rRUM, the MLE performed better for low-quality tests, whereas the MMLE worked better for high-quality tests. For the DINA model, the ID method tended to produce better quality Q-matrix estimates than other methods for large sample sizes (i.e., 500 or 1,000). In addition, the Q-matrix was more precisely estimated under the discrete uniform distribution than under the multivariate normal threshold model for all the above methods. On average, the sigma(2) and ID method with higher true negative rates are better for correcting misspecified Q-entries, whereas the MLE with higher true positive rates is better for retaining the correct Q-entries. Experiment results on real data set confirmed the effectiveness of the MLE.

• 出版日期2018-9
• 单位江西师范大学; 西安交通大学