Miniaturized versus conventional cardiopulmonary bypass in high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery

作者：Koivisto Simo Pekka; Wistbacka Jan Ola; Rimpilainen Riikka; Nissinen Juha; Loponen Pertti; Teittinen Kari; Biancari Fausto^*

来源：Perfusion-UK, 2010, 25(2): 65-70.

DOI：10.1177/0267659110364443

• Cardiopulmonary bypass
• miniaturized
• coronary artery bypass surgery

Objective: To review our results with the use of miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass (Mini-CPB) versus conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (C-CPB) in high-risk patients (additive EuroSCORE >= 6) who have undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).
Patients and methods: This study includes a consecutive series of 236 patients with an additive EuroSCORE >= 6 who underwent CABG, employing either C-CPB or Mini-CPB. Propensity score analysis was performed.
Results: The study groups had similar EuroSCOREs. Stroke rate was significantly higher among C-CPB patients (5.4% vs. 0%, p=0.026). In-hospital mortality (4.8% vs. 3.4%, p=0.75) and combined adverse end-point rate were higher in C-CPB patients (20.4% vs. 13.5%, p=0.18). Postoperative bleeding and need for transfusion were similar in the study groups, but re-sternotomy for bleeding was more frequent among C-CPB patients (4.8% vs. 1.1%, p=0.26). Seventy-four propensity matched pairs had similar immediate postoperative results: C-CPB patients had higher mortality (6.8% vs. 4.1%, p=0.72), stroke (5.4% vs. 0%, p=0.12) and combined adverse end-point rates (27.0% vs. 16.2%, p=0.11), but such differences failed to reach statistical significance.
Conclusions: Mini-CPB achieved somewhat better results than C-CPB in these high-risk patients undergoing isolated CABG. This study confirmed that cerebral protection could be the main benefit associated with the use of Mini-CPB.

• 出版日期2010-3