摘要

Fire suppression and other past management practices in the western USA have led to dense conifer forests with high canopy cover and thick layers of surface fuels, changes likely to alter understory microclimate relative to historical conditions. Silvicultural treatments are used to restore forest resilience, but little is known about their microclimate-mediated effects on fire behavior. We measured fire-related microclimate variables for two years before and after experimental, operational-scale application of fuels-reduction thinning and group selection treatments in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest. Measurements included air speed, temperature, and relative humidity; soil temperature and moisture; and dead fuel moisture. Wind gust speed increased moderately (average 0.7 m s(-1) or 31% increase) in thinned forest and sharply (average 2.5 m s(-1) or 128% increase) in group-selection openings. Surprisingly, treatments did not affect air temperature or humidity. Soil temperatures increased by a mean of 4 degrees C in group openings but did not increase in thinned stands. Duff moisture in group selection openings was 72% of that in the control stands, but there were no effects on moisture in other fuel particle size classes, or in thinned stands. Soil moisture increased in group-selection openings at depths down to 0.7 m but did not change in thinned stands. Fire spread simulation modeling with FMAPlus indicated that elevated wind speeds could increase the fire rate of spread, but that increases are moderate and largely linear rather than exponential across the observed range of wind gust speeds. In general our results suggest that group selection openings placed in high canopy cover, Sierran mixed-conifer forests are distinct microclimatic environments that will have slightly different fire behavior than the surrounding matrix due to higher surface temperatures and faster wind speeds. Current fuels-reduction thinning practices in dry western forests, however, will have minimal microclimatic-mediated influence on wildfire behavior, and there is little cause for concern about a faster rate of fire spread or drier fuels in such stands. Published by Elsevier B.V.

  • 出版日期2012-1-15