A short note on integrated assessment modeling approaches: Rejoinder to the review of "Making or breaking climate targets - The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy"

作者：Kriegler Elmar^*; Riahi Keywan; Bauer Nico; Schwanitz Valeria Jana; Petermann Nils; Bosetti Valentina; Marcucci Adriana; Otto Sander; Paroussos Leonidas; Rao Skirbekk Shilpa; Curras Tabare Arroyo; Ashina Shuichi; Bollen Johannes; Eom Jiyong; Hamdi Cherif Meriem; Longden Thomas; Kitous Alban; Mejean Aurelie; Sano Fuminori; Schaeffer Michiel; Wada Kenichi; Capros Pantelis; van Vuuren Detlef P; Edenhofer Ottmar; Bertram Christoph; Bibas Ruben; Edmonds Jae; Johnson Nils

来源：Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2015, 99: 273-276.

DOI：10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.011

• Integrated assessment modeling
• Model comparison
• Mitigation costs
• Model documentation
• Peer review

We provide a rejoinder to a review (Rosen, 2015) of our original article "Making or breaking climate targets the AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy" (Kriegler et al., 2015a). We have a substantial disagreement with the content of the review, and feel that it is plagued by a number of misconceptions about the nature of the AMPERE study and the integrated assessment modeling approach employed by it. We therefore see this rejoinder as an opportunity to clarify these misconceptions and advance the debate by providing a clearer understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, and ultimately the value of integrated assessment.

• 出版日期2015-10
• 单位ETH, Zurich; 国际应用系统分析学会(IIASA)