High Rate of Complete Viral Suppression With Combination Therapy in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B and Prior Treatment Failure

作者：Wong Carrie R; Trinh Huy N; Yip Benjamin; Nguyen Huy A; Garcia Ruel T; Ahmed Aijaz; Keeffe Emmet B; Nguyen Mindie H^*

来源：Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 2011, 45(10): 900-905.

DOI：10.1097/MCG.0b013e318224d64f

• chronic hepatitis B
• combination therapy
• treatment failure
• antiviral resistance
• partial response

Background: Combination therapy for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is recommended for patients with antiviral resistance (AVR) or partial response (PR) to earlier antiviral therapy; however, data on outcomes are limited.
Goals: To determine the rate of complete viral suppression (CVS) with combination therapy and to compare CVS among different indications and treatment regimens.
Methods: A cohort of 109 consecutive patients with chronic hepatitis B from 3 liver clinics in Northern California was retrospectively studied. All patients started combination therapy between April 2004 and August 2009 for the following indications: AVR (n = 29), PR (n = 60), or others (n = 20). Combination treatments included lamivudine (LAM), adefovir (ADV), telbivudine (LdT), entecavir (ETV), tenofovir (TDF), and emtricitabine (FTC). CVS was defined as undetectable serum HBV DNA < 100 IU/mL.
Results: Among the patients, who were nearly all Asian (99%), 73% had >= 2 prior treatments and 82% had treatment failure (AVR or PR). Median treatment duration of combination therapy was 21 months (range, 6 to 50 mo). The majority (77%) achieved CVS after 6 months of various combination regimens: 80% for ETV vertical bar TDF, 76% for TDF vertical bar LAM or FTC or LdT, 75% for ETV + ADV, and 69% for ADV + LAM or LdT (P = 0.86). After 6 months of therapy, CVS was observed in a similar proportion of patients treated for PR and AVR (72% and 74%, respectively).
Conclusions: Although the majority of 109 treatment-experienced patients had prior treatment failure, high rates of CVS were rapidly achieved and did not significantly differ between indications of AVR and PR or between ETV-based and TDF-based regimens.

• 出版日期2011-12