摘要

The number of fish habitat improvement schemes has greatly increased in response to the widespread degradation of aquatic ecosystems. However, many of these enhancement projects often fail to create expected habitat conditions, because they are rarely planned and executed with inputs from the species' habitat requirements throughout their life histories, and it is frequently assumed that the implementation of a specific instream structure for habitat improvement will always benefit all species present. Using a 2D hydraulic model, the present study evaluates the potential habitat improvement for two critically endangered fish species-the Southwestern arched-mouth nase Iberochondrostoma almacai and the Arade chub Squalius aradensis-resulting from simulating the introduction of different instream structures (islands, lateral bays, and deflectors) in a modified Mediterranean river reach. The introduction of islands in the river channel was found to be the best improvement measure for YOY and juvenile nase and chub, as shown by increases in the mean annual Weighted Usable Area (WUA) of more than 100 and 50%, respectively, compared to the present conditions. On the other hand, the simulation with current deflectors proved to be the worst scenario, particularly for nase, with mean annual WUA decreasing by 3.6, 17.8 and 22.7% for YOY, juveniles and adults, respectively. The findings of this study point to the need to account for different species life-history stages when modelling the implementation of instream structures for habitat improvement and also provide a sound basis for future conservation-related studies conducted in Mediterranean rivers that harbour other threatened "sister" species.

全文