Comparison of methods for determination of total oil sands-derived naphthenic acids in water samples

作者：Hughes Sarah A; Huang Rongfu; Mahaffey Ashley; Chelme Ayala Pamela; Klamerth Nikolaus; Meshref Mohamed N A; Ibrahim Mohamed D; Brown Christine; Peru Kerry M; Headley John V; El Din Mohamed Gamal

来源：Chemosphere, 2017, 187: 376-384.

DOI：10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.123

• Oil sands
• Oil sands process-affected water
• Groundwater
• Naphthenic acids

There are several established methods for the determination of naphthenic acids (NAs) in waters associated with oil sands mining operations. Due to their highly complex nature, measured concentration and composition of NAs vary depending on the method used. This study compared different common sample preparation techniques, analytical instrument methods, and analytical standards to measure NAs in groundwater and process water samples collected from an active oil sands operation. In general, the high- and ultrahigh-resolution methods, namely high performance liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-TOF-MS) and Orbitrap mass spectrometry (Orbitrap-MS), were within an order of magnitude of the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) methods. The gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) methods consistently had the highest NA concentrations and greatest standard error. Total NAs concentration was not statistically different between sample preparation of solid phase extraction and liquid-liquid extraction. Calibration standards influenced quantitation results. This work provided a comprehensive understanding of the inherent differences in the various techniques available to measure NAs and hence the potential differences in measured amounts of NAs in samples. Results from this study will contribute to the analytical method standardization for NA analysis in oil sands related water samples.

• 出版日期2017-11
• 单位Saskatoon