Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment failure detection depends on monitoring interval and microbiological method

作者:Mitnick Carole D; White Richard A; Lu Chunling; Rodriguez Carly A; Bayona Jaime; Becerra Mercedes C; Burgos Marcos; Centis Rosella; Cohen Theodore; Cox Helen; D' Ambrosio Lia; Danilovitz Manfred; Falzon Dennis; Gelmanova Irina Y; Gler Maria T; Grinsdale Jennifer A; Holtz Timothy H; Keshavjee Salmaan; Leimane Vaira; Menzies Dick; Migliori Giovanni Battista; Milstein Meredith B; Mishustin Sergey P; Pagano Marcello; Quelapio Maria I; Shean Karen
来源:European Respiratory Journal, 2016, 48(4): 1160-1170.
DOI:10.1183/13993003.00462-2016

摘要

Debate persists about monitoring method (culture or smear) and interval (monthly or less frequently) during treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). We analysed existing data and estimated the effect of monitoring strategies on timing of failure detection. We identified studies reporting microbiological response to MDR-TB treatment and solicited individual patient data from authors. Frailty survival models were used to estimate pooled relative risk of failure detection in the last 12 months of treatment; hazard of failure using monthly culture was the reference. Data were obtained for 5410 patients across 12 observational studies. During the last 12 months of treatment, failure detection occurred in a median of 3 months by monthly culture; failure detection was delayed by 2, 7, and 9 months relying on bimonthly culture, monthly smear and bimonthly smear, respectively. Risk (95% CI) of failure detection delay resulting from monthly smear relative to culture is 0.38 (0.34-0.42) for all patients and 0.33 (0.25-0.42) for HIV-co-infected patients. Failure detection is delayed by reducing the sensitivity and frequency of the monitoring method. Monthly monitoring of sputum cultures from patients receiving MDR-TB treatment is recommended. Expanded laboratory capacity is needed for high-quality culture, and for smear microscopy and rapid molecular tests.