Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Thresholds and Diffusion Lesion Volume in Acute Stroke

作者：Thomas Ralph G R; Lymer G Katherine; Armitage Paul A; Chappell Francesca M; Carpenter Trevor; Karaszewski Bartosz; Dennis Martin S; Wardlaw Joanna M^*

来源：Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 2013, 22(7): 906-909.

DOI：10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.09.018

• Stroke
• apparent diffusion coefficient
• magnetic resonance imaging
• threshold

Background: Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) thresholds are used to determine acute stroke lesion volume, but the reliability of this approach and comparability to the volume of the magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (MR-DWI) hyperintense lesion is unclear. Methods: We prospectively recruited and clinically assessed patients who had experienced acute ischemic stroke and performed DWI less than 24 hours and at 3 to 7 days after stroke. We compared the volume of the manually outlined DW hyperintense lesion (reference standard) with lesion volumes derived from 3 commonly used ADC thresholds: .55 x 10(-3)/mm(2)/second(-1), .65 x 10(-3)/mm(2)/second(-1), and .75 x 10(-3)/mm(2)/second(-1), with and without "editing" of erroneous tissue. We compared the volumes obtained by reference standard, "raw," and "edited" thresholds. Results: Among 33 representative patients, the acute DWI lesion volume was 15,284 mm(3); the median unedited/edited ADC volumes were 52,972/2786 mm(3), 92,707/6,987 mm(3), and 227,681/unmeasureable mm(3) (.55 x 10(-3)/mm(2)/second(-1), .65 x 10(-3)/mm(2)/second(-1), and .75 x 10(-3)/mm(2)/second(-1) thresholds, respectively). Subacute lesions gave similar differences. These differences between edited and unedited diffusion-weighted imaging and ADC volumes were statistically significant. Conclusions: Threshold-derived ADC volumes require substantial manual editing to avoid over-or underestimating the visible DWI lesion and should be used with caution.

• 出版日期2013-10