Does experience in hysteroscopy improve accuracy and inter-observer agreement in the management of abnormal uterine bleeding?

作者：Bourdel Nicolas; Modaffari Paola; Tognazza Enrica; Pertile Riccardo; Chauvet Pauline; Botchorishivili Revaz; Savary Dennis; Pouly Jean Luc; Rabischong Benoit; Canis Michel

来源：Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 2016, 30(12): 5558-5564.

DOI：10.1007/s00464-016-4928-4

• Inter-observer agreement
• Reproducibility
• Accuracy
• Hysteroscopy
• Abnormal uterine bleeding

Hysteroscopic reliability may be influenced by the experience of the operator and by a lack of morphological diagnostic criteria for endometrial malignant pathologies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and the inter-observer agreement (IOA) in the management of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) among different experienced gynecologists.
Each gynecologist, without any other clinical information, was asked to evaluate the anonymous video recordings of 51 consecutive patients who underwent hysteroscopy and endometrial resection for AUB. Experts (> 500 hysteroscopies), seniors (20-499 procedures) and junior (aecurrency sign19 procedures) gynecologists were asked to judge endometrial macroscopic appearance (benign, suspicious or frankly malignant). They also had to propose the histological diagnosis (atrophic or proliferative endometrium; simple, glandulocystic or atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma). Observers were free to indicate whether the quality of recordings were not good enough for adequate assessment. IOA (k coefficient), sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and the likelihood ratio were calculated.
Five expert, five senior and six junior gynecologists were involved in the study. Considering endometrial cancer and endometrial atypical hyperplasia, sensitivity and specificity were respectively 55.5 % and 84.5 % for juniors, 66.6 % and 81.2 % for seniors and 86.6 % and 87.3 % for experts. Concerning endometrial macroscopic appearance, IOA was poor for juniors (k = 0.10) and fair for seniors and experts (k = 0.23 and 0.22, respectively). IOA was poor for juniors and experts (k = 0.18 and 0.20, respectively) and fair for seniors (k = 0.30) in predicting the histological diagnosis.
Sensitivity improves with the observer's experience, but inter-observer agreement and reproducibility of hysteroscopy for endometrial malignancies are not satisfying no matter the level of expertise. Therefore, an accurate and complete endometrial sampling is still needed.

• 出版日期2016-12