Double-Bundle Versus Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction A Prospective Randomized Study With 5-Year Results

作者：Suomalainen Piia^*; Jarvela Timo; Paakkala Antti; Kannus Pekka; Jarvinen Markku

来源：The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2012, 40(7): 1511-1518.

DOI：10.1177/0363546512448177

• anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
• double-bundle versus single-bundle ACL reconstruction
• osteoarthritis of the knee
• radiograph

Background: Surgical technique is essential in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. %26lt;br%26gt;Purpose: This randomized 5-year study tested the hypothesis that double-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring autografts and aperture screw fixation has fewer graft ruptures and rates of osteoarthritis (OA) and better stability than single-bundle reconstruction. %26lt;br%26gt;Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. %26lt;br%26gt;Methods: Ninety patients were randomized: double-bundle ACL reconstruction with bioabsorbable screw fixation (DB group; n = 30), single-bundle ACL reconstruction with bioabsorbable screw fixation (SBB group; n = 30), and single-bundle ACL reconstruction with metallic screw fixation (SBM group; n = 30). The following evaluation methods were used: clinical examination, KT-1000 arthrometer measurement, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm knee scores. Additionally, radiographic evaluation was made by a musculoskeletal radiologist who was unaware of the patients%26apos; clinical and surgical data. A single orthopaedic surgeon performed all the operations, and clinical follow-up assessments were made in a blinded manner by an independent examiner. %26lt;br%26gt;Results: Preoperatively, there were no differences between the groups. Eleven patients (7 in the SBB group, 3 in the SBM group, and 1 in the DB group) had a graft failure during the follow-up and went on to ACL revision surgery (P %26lt; .043). Of the remaining 79 patients, a 5-year follow-up was performed for 65 patients (20 in the DB group, 21 in the SBB group, and 24 in the SBM group) who had their grafts intact. At 5 years, there was no statistically significant difference in the pivot-shift or KT-1000 arthrometer tests. In the DB group, 20% of the patients had OA in the medial femorotibial compartment and 10% in the lateral compartment, while the corresponding figures were 33% and 18% in the single-bundle groups, again an insignificant finding. Further, no significant group differences were found in the knee scores. %26lt;br%26gt;Conclusion: The double-bundle surgery resulted in significantly fewer graft failures and subsequent revision ACL surgery than the single-bundle surgeries during the 5-year follow-up. Knee stability and OA rates were similar at 5 years. In view of the size of the groups, some caution should be exercised when interpreting the lack of difference in the secondary outcomes.

• 出版日期2012-7