科研之友
微信
新浪微博
Facebook
分享链接
摘要
The taxonomic position of Panax bipinnatifidus is controversial and problematic. To infer inter- or intra-specific morphological relationship in Panax bipinnatifidus and its allies-P. sikkimensis and P. sokpayensis, we carried out a phenetic study of these taxa, based on thirteen morphological characters (eight quantitative and five qualitative), using univariate and multivariate analysis. The results obtained from the principle component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis (CA) revealed lack of taxonomic differences between Panax bipinnatifidus and P. sikkimensis, whereas P. sokpayensis showed distinct morphological features. Discriminant analysis (DA) of the quantitative morphological characters also did not reveal any dissimilarity between Panax bipinnatifidus and P. sikkimensis. There were no differences between majority of the morphological characters of Panax bipinnatifidus and P. sikkimensis except for the presence of pinnate leaflets and absence of bracts in the latter. The lack of differences in morphological characters of Panax bipinnatifidus and P. sikkimensis suggest that these two taxa are part of the same species complex. Our field studies show that Panax binnatifidus does not occur as an independent species anywhere in nature, but always shows a congeneric association with P. sikkimensis. In addition, the morphotype of undivided leaflets (P. sikkimensis) is more normal and common than the morphotype of pinnate or bipinnate leaflets (P. bipinnatifidus) in natural populations. Following the principle of priority of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature we conclude that Panax bipinnatifidus is a distinct species, while P. sikkimensis is a synonym of P. bipinnatifidus in Indian Himalaya. Based on the present investigations we propose that Panax bipinnatifidus Seem. should be given recognition and priority for the specific rank as opposed to the views of earlier workers. A taxonomic key of the studied taxa is provided.
- 出版日期2011-11
