科研之友
微信
新浪微博
Facebook
分享链接
摘要
Motivation: Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is now routinely used for the detection and identification of genetic variants, particularly single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in humans, and this has provided valuable new insights into human diversity, population histories and genetic association studies of traits and diseases. However, this relies on accurate detection and genotyping calling of the polymorphisms present in the samples sequenced. To minimize cost, the majority of current WGS studies, including the 1000 Genomes Project (1 KGP) have adopted low coverage sequencing of large number of samples, where such designs have inadvertently influenced the development of variant calling methods on WGS data. Assessment of variant accuracy are usually performed on the same set of low coverage individuals or a smaller number of deeply sequenced individuals. It is thus unclear how these variant calling methods would fare for a dataset of similar to 100 samples from a population not part of the 1 KGP that have been sequenced at various coverage depths. Results: Using down-sampling of the sequencing reads obtained from the Singapore Sequencing Malay Project (SSMP), and a set of SNP calls from the same individuals genotyped on the Illumina Omni1-Quad array, we assessed the sensitivity of SNP detection, accuracy of genotype calls made and variant accuracy for six commonly used variant calling methods of GATK, SAMtools, Consensus Assessment of Sequence and Variation (CASAVA), VarScan, glfTools and SOAPsnp. The results indicate that at 5x coverage depth, the multi-sample callers of GATK and SAMtools yield the best accuracy particularly if the study samples are called together with a large number of individuals such as those from 1000 Genomes Project. If study samples are sequenced at a high coverage depth such as 30x, CASAVA has the highest variant accuracy as compared with the other variant callers assessed.
- 出版日期2014-6-15
