Second-Generation vs. First-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Calcified Coronary Lesions - Pooled Analysis From the RESET and NEXT Trials

作者：Nishida Koji; Nakatsuma Kenji; Shiomi Hiroki; Natsuaki Masahiro; Kawai Kazuya; Morimoto Takeshi; Kozuma Ken; Igarashi Keiichi; Kadota Kazushige; Tanabe Kengo; Morino Yoshihiro; Hibi Kiyoshi; Akasaka Takashi; Abe Mitsuru; Suwa Satoru; Muramatsu Toshiya; Kobayashi Masakazu; Dai Kazuoki; Nakao Koichi; Tarutani Yasuhiro; Fujii Kenshi; Kimura Takeshi

来源：Circulation Journal, 2018, 82(2): 376-+.

DOI：10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0746

• Coronary artery calcification
• Percutaneous coronary intervention
• Second-generation drug-eluting stents

Background: The comparative efficacy of second-generation (G2) vs. first-generation (G1) drug-eluting stents (DES) for calcified coronary lesions is unknown.
Methods and Results: We compared the 3-year clinical outcomes of patients with G1- or G2-DES according to the presence or absence of calcified coronary lesions as assessed in an angiographic core laboratory using data from 2 large-scale prospective multicenter randomized trials, RESET and NEXT. G1-DES and G2-DES were implanted in 299 and 1,033 patients, respectively, in the Calc stratum (>= 1 lesion with moderate/severe calcification), and 1,208 and 3,550 patients, respectively, in the Non-calc stratum (no/mild calcification). The patients in the Calc stratum had a significantly higher adjusted risk for the primary outcome measure (any target-lesion revascularization (TLR)) than those in the Non-calc stratum (HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.11-1.71, P=0.004). The cumulative 3-year incidence of any TLR was not significantly different between the G1-DES and G2-DES groups in both the Calc and Non-calc strata (12.1% vs. 9.7%, P=0.22, and 6.8% vs. 6.1%, P=0.44, respectively). After adjusting for confounders, the effect of G2-DES relative to G1-DES for any TLR remained insignificant in both the Calc and Non-calc strata (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.48-1.25, P=0.3, and HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.61-1.17, P=0.31, respectively, P interaction=0.55).
Conclusions: The effect of G2-DES relative to G1-DES for TLR was not significantly different regardless of the presence or absence of lesion calcification.

• 出版日期2018-2