Multiple failure modes analysis and weighted risk priority number evaluation in FMEA

作者：Xiao, Ningcong; Huang, Hong-Zhong^*; Li, Yanfeng; He, Liping; Jin, Tongdan

来源：Engineering Failure Analysis, 2011, 18(4): 1162-1170.

DOI：10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.02.004

• Multiple failures mode
• Risk priority number
• Weight risk priority number
• FMEA

Traditionally, failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) only considers the impact of single failure on the system. For large and complex systems, since multiple failures of components exist, assessing multiple failure modes with all possible combinations is impractical. Pickard et al. [1] introduced a useful method to simultaneously analyze multiple failures for complex systems. However, they did not indicate which failures need to be considered and how to combine them appropriately. This paper extends Pickard's work by proposing a minimum cut set based method for assessing the impact of multiple failure modes. In addition, traditional FMEA is made by addressing problems in an order from the biggest risk priority number (RPN) to the smallest ones. However, one disadvantage of this approach is that it ignores the fact that three factors (Severity (S), Occurrence (O), Detection (D)) (S, O, D) have the different weights in system rather than equality. For examples, reasonable weights for factors S, O are higher than the weight of D for some non-repairable systems. In this paper, we extended the definition of RPN by multiplying it with a weight parameter, which characterize the importance of the failure causes within the system. Finally, the effectiveness of the method is demonstrated with numerical examples.

• 出版日期2011-6
• 单位电子科技大学