科研之友
微信
新浪微博
Facebook
分享链接
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: To investigate potential benefits and drawbacks of the clinical use of chest tomosynthesis (CTS), to what extent CTS obviates the need for chest computed tomography (CT), and what reduction in radiation dose thereby can be achieved. %26lt;br%26gt;Materials and Methods: The Regional Ethical Review Board approved the follow-up study of patients examined with CTS as part of clinical routine. For each case, two radiologists in consensus determined whether CT would have been performed, had CTS not been an option, and whether CTS was an adequate examination. Thereafter, it was determined whether the use of CTS instead of CT in retrospect was beneficial, neutral, or detrimental for the radiological work-up. The radiation dose to the patient population was determined both for the actual clinical situation and for the alternative scenario that would result, had CTS not been available. %26lt;br%26gt;Results: During 1 month 3.5 years before the survey, 149 patients (74 women, age 18-91 years) had undergone CTS for clinical purposes. It was judged that CT would have been performed in 100 cases, had CTS not been available, and that CTS obviated the need for CT in 80 cases. CTS was judged as beneficial, neutral, and detrimental for the radiological work-up in 85, 13, and two cases, respectively. For the entire study population, the use of CTS decreased the average effective dose from 2.7 to 0.7 mSv. %26lt;br%26gt;Conclusions: The present study indicates that CTS may have benefits for the radiological work-up as it has the potential to both optimize the use of CT resources and reduce the effective dose to the patient population. A drawback is that CTS examinations may fail to reveal pathology visible with CT and in clinically doubtful cases further investigations including other imaging procedures should be considered.
- 出版日期2014-11
