Data Variance and Statistical Significance in 2D-Gel Electrophoresis and DIGE Experiments: Comparison of the Effects of Normalization Methods

作者：Keeping Andrew J; Collins Richard A^*

来源：Journal of Proteome Research, 2011, 10(3): 1353-1360.

DOI：10.1021/pr101080e

• normalization
• DIGE
• internal reference
• internal standard
• two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
• 2-D PAGE

Identifying changes in the relative abundance of proteins between different biological samples is often confounded by technical noise. In this work, we compared eight normalization methods commonly used in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE) experiments for their ability to reduce noise and for their influence on the list of proteins whose difference in abundance between two samples is determined to be statistically significant. With respect to reducing noise we find that, while all methods improve upon unnormalized data, cyclic linear normalization is the least well suited to gel-based proteomics and the performances of the other methods are similar. We also find in DIGE data that the choice of normalization method has less of an impact on the noise than does the decision to use an internal reference in the experimental design and that both normalization and standardization using the internal reference are required to maximally reduce variance. Despite the similar noise reduction achieved by most normalization methods, the list of proteins whose abundance was determined to differ significantly between biological groups differed depending on the choice of normalization method. This work provides a direct comparison of the impact of normalization methods in the context of common experimental designs.

• 出版日期2011-3