Detection and Classification of Calcifications on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and 2D Digital Mammography: A Comparison

作者：Spangler M Lee^*; Zuley Margarita L; Sumkin Jules H; Abrams Gordan; Ganott Marie A; Hakim Christiane; Perrin Ronald; Chough Denise M; Shah Ratan; Gur David

来源：American Journal of Roentgenology, 2011, 196(2): 320-324.

DOI：10.2214/AJR.10.4656

• calcifications
• digital breast tomosynthesis
• digital mammography

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to compare the ability of digital breast tomosynthesis and full field digital mammography (FFDM) to detect and characterize calcifications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred paired examinations were performed utilizing FFDM and digital breast tomosynthesis. Twenty biopsy-proven cancers, 40 biopsy-proven benign calcifications, and 40 randomly selected negative screening studies were retrospectively reviewed by five radiologists in a crossed multireader multimodal observer performance study. Data collected included the presence of calcifications and forced BI-RADS scores. Receiver operator curve analysis using BI-RADS was performed.
RESULTS. Overall calcification detection sensitivity was higher for FFDM (0.84% [95% CI, 0.79-0.88%]) than for digital breast tomosynthesis (0.75% [95% CI, 0.70-0.80%]). In the cancer cohort, 75 (76%) of 99 interpretations identified calcification in both modes. Of those, a BI-RADS score less than or equal to 2 was rendered in three (4%) and nine (12%) cases with FFDM and digital breast tomosynthesis, respectively. In the benign cohort, 123 (62%) of 200 interpretations identified calcifications in both modes. Of those, a BI-RADS score greater than or equal to 3 was assigned in 105 (85%) and 93 (76%) cases with FFDM and digital breast tomosynthesis, respectively. There was no significant difference in the nonparametric computed area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) using the BI-RADS scores (FFDM, AUC = 0.76 and SD = 0.03; digital breast tomosynthesis, AUC = 0.72 and SD = 0.04 [p = 0.1277]).
CONCLUSION. In this small data set, FFDM appears to be slightly more sensitive than digital breast tomosynthesis for the detection of calcification. However, diagnostic performance as measured by area under the curve using BI-RADS was not significantly different. With improvements in processing algorithms and display, digital breast tomosynthesis could potentially be improved for this purpose.

• 出版日期2011-2