An analysis of spine fusion outcomes in sheep pre-clinical models

作者：Lindley Emily M; Barton Cameron; Blount Thomas; Burger Evalina L; Cain Christopher M J; Seim Howard B III; Turner A Simon; Patel Vikas V

来源：European Spine Journal, 2017, 26(1): 228-239.

DOI：10.1007/s00586-016-4544-y

• Sheep
• Ovine
• Spine
• Fusion
• Lumbar

The ovine model is often used to evaluate new spine fusion technologies prior to clinical testing. An important aspect of designing sheep surgery protocols is to select the appropriate postoperative time period for comparing fusion outcomes. Unfortunately, determining the ideal study endpoint is complicated by the fact that prior published studies have not used consistent timeframes. Thus, the primary aim of this study was to provide a reference for investigators as to the expected fusion outcomes of control groups at varying timepoints in sheep spine surgery models.
We identified published sheep fusion studies using autograft, interbody cages, and/or instrumentation. Fusion data were extracted, converted to a common scale, and analyzed across studied timepoints.
Overall, 29 studies of 360 fusion levels were identified: 11 ALIF (158 levels), 3 PLIF/TLIF (28 levels), 8 PLF (90 levels), and 7 ACDF (84 levels). Studied timepoints ranged from 4 to 48 weeks postoperative. In general, fusion rates varied across techniques and instrumentation. The time to reach solid fusion differed by as many as 20 weeks between control groups.
Recommended timeframes for future studies designed to show either superiority over controls or equivalent outcomes with controls were developed based on aggregate results. Designating ideal study endpoints for sheep fusion models has both ethical implications associated with responsible use of animals in research, and economic implications given the cost of animal research. The current results can guide the development of future research methods and help investigators choose appropriate study timelines for various control groups.

• 出版日期2017-1