A biomechanical comparison between cortical bone trajectory fixation and pedicle screw fixation

作者：Oshino Hiroki; Sakakibara Toshihiko; Inaba Tadashi; Yoshikawa Takamasa; Kato Takaya; Kasai Yuichi^*

来源：Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2015, 10(1): 125.

DOI：10.1186/s13018-015-0270-0

• Lumbar spine
• Biomechanics
• Spinal fusion
• Spinal instrumentation
• Stability

Purpose: There have been several reports on the pullout strength of cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws, but only one study has reviewed the stability of functional spine units using the CBT method. The purpose of this study was to compare vertebral stability after CBT fixation with that after pedicle screw (PS) fixation.
Methods: In this study, 20 lumbar spine (L5-6) specimens were assigned to two groups: the CBT model group that underwent CBT screw fixation (n = 10) and the PS model group that underwent pedicle screw fixation (n = 10). Using a six-axis material testing machine, bend and rotation tests were conducted on each model. The angular displacement from the time of no load to the time of maximum torque was defined as range of motion (ROM), and then, the mean ROM in the bend and rotation tests and the mean rate of relative change of ROM in both the bend and rotation tests were compared between the CBT and PS groups.
Results: There were no significant differences between the CBT and PS groups with regard to the mean ROMs and the mean rate of relative change of ROMs in both the bend and rotation tests.
Conclusion: Intervertebral stability after CBT fixation was similar to that after PS fixation.

• 出版日期2015-8-16