Different Routes of Misoprostol for Same-Day Cervical Priming Prior to Operative Hysteroscopy: A Randomized Blinded Trial

作者:Herman Hadas Ganer*; Kerner Ram; Gluck Ohad; Feit Hagit; Keidar Ran; Bar Jacob; Sagiv Ron
来源:Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2017, 24(3): 455-460.
DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2016.12.024

摘要

Study Objective: To compare the effectiveness of and patient satisfaction with different routes of misoprostol administration for short-term cervical priming before operative hysteroscopy. Design: Randomized blinded trial (Canadian Task Force classification I). Setting: University hospital. Patients: One hundred and twenty patients undergoing operative hysteroscopy. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 400 mu g of misoprostol administered orally (n = 40), vaginally (n = 40), or sublingually (n = 40) for cervical priming at 1.5 to 4 hours before undergoing operative hysteroscopy. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was preoperative cervical dilatation. Secondary outcomes included cervical consistency, ease of dilation and time of dilation, patient discomfort, and side effects. No differences were noted among the 3 groups in terms of patient age, parity, previous vaginal delivery, menopausal status, and time interval from preparation to procedure. Patients in the 3 groups reported similar discomfort and side effects. Initial mean cervical dilatation was 6.1 +/- 2.0 mm in the oral group, 6.4 +/- 2.1 in the vaginal group, and 6.4 +/- 1.8 mm in the sublingual group (p = .75). Cervical consistency and ease of dilation were similar among the groups. The mean time of dilation was 37.2 +/- 30.6 seconds in the oral group, 31.7 +/- 29.0 seconds in the vaginal group, and 31.5 +/- 21.7 seconds in the sublingual group (p = .59). Additional sub analyses according to menopausal status and parity did not demonstrate any differences among the groups. Conclusion: Same-day cervical priming for operative hysteroscopy is achieved equally with all routes of misoprostol administration, with similar patient satisfaction and side effects.

  • 出版日期2017-4