No evidence for intervention-dependent influence of methodological features on treatment effect

作者：Jacobs Wilco C H^*; Kruyt Moyo C; Moojen Wouter A; Verbout Ab J; Oner F Cumhur

来源：Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2013, 66(12): 1347-1355.

DOI：10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.06.007

• Risk of bias
• Research design
• Randomization
• Allocation concealment
• Effect modifier
• Epidemiologic

Objectives: The goal of this systematic review was to evaluate if the influence of methodological features on treatment effect differs between types of intervention. %26lt;br%26gt;Study Design and Setting: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane methodology register, and reference lists were searched for meta-epidemiologic studies on the influence of methodological features on treatment effect. Studies analyzing influence of methodological features related to internal validity were included. We made a distinction among surgical, pharmaceutical, and therapeutical as separate types of intervention. Heterogeneity was calculated to identify differences among these types. %26lt;br%26gt;Results: Fourteen meta-epidemiologic studies were found with 51 estimates of influence of methodological features on treatment effect. Heterogeneity was observed among the intervention types for randomization. Surgical intervention studies showed a larger treatment effect when randomized; this was in contrast to pharmaceutical studies that found the opposite. For allocation concealment and double blinding, the influence of methodological features on the treatment effect was comparable across different types of intervention. For the remaining methodological features, there were insufficient observations. %26lt;br%26gt;Conclusion: The influence of allocation concealment and double blinding on the treatment effect is consistent across studies of different interventional types. The influence of randomization although, may be different between surgical and nonsurgical studies.

• 出版日期2013-12