A comparison of relative-frequency and threshold-hunting methods to determine stimulus intensity in transcranial magnetic stimulation

作者：Silbert B I; Patterson H I; Pevcic D D; Windnagel K A; Thickbroom G W^*

来源：Clinical Neurophysiology, 2013, 124(4): 708-712.

DOI：10.1016/j.clinph.2012.09.018

• Transcranial magnetic stimulation
• Threshold
• IFCN
• Rossini-Rothwell
• PEST

Objective: Stimulation intensity (SI) in transcranial magnetic stimulation is commonly set in relation to motor threshold (MT), or to achieve a motor-evoked potential (MEP) of predefined amplitude (usually 1 mV). Recently, IFCN recommended adaptive threshold-hunting over the previously endorsed relative-frequency method. We compared the Rossini-Rothwell (R-R) relative-frequency method to an adaptive threshold-hunting method based on parameter estimation by sequential testing (PEST) for determining MT and the SI to target a MEP amplitude of 1 mV (I-1 mV). %26lt;br%26gt;Methods: In 10 healthy controls we determined MT and I-1 (mV) with R-R and PEST using a blinded crossover design, and performed within-session serial PEST measurements of MT. %26lt;br%26gt;Results: There was no significant difference between methods for MT (52.6 +/- 2.6% vs. 53.7 +/- 3.1%; p = 0.302; % maximum stimulator output; R-R vs. PEST, respectively) or I-1 mV (66.7 +/- 3.0% vs. 68.8 +/- 3.8%; p = 0.146). There was strong correlation between R-R and PEST estimates for both MT and I-1 mV. R-R required significantly more stimuli than PEST. Serial measurements of MT with PEST were reproducible. %26lt;br%26gt;Conclusions: PEST has the advantage of speed without sacrificing precision when compared to the R-R method, and is adaptable to other SI targets. %26lt;br%26gt;Significance: Our results in healthy controls add to increasing evidence in favour of adaptive threshold-hunting methods for determining SI.

• 出版日期2013-4