AQUILA: assessment of quality in lower limb arthroplasty. An expert Delphi consensus for total knee and total hip arthroplasty

作者：Pijls Bart G^*; Dekkers Olaf M; Middeldorp Saskia; Valstar Edward R; van der Heide Huub J L; Van der Linden Van der Zwaag Henrica M J; Nelissen Rob G H H

来源：BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2011, 12(1): 173.

DOI：10.1186/1471-2474-12-173

• Total Knee Arthroplasty
• Total Hip Arthroplasty
• Reporting Quality
• Methodological Quality
• Generalizability

Background: In the light of both the importance and large numbers of case series and cohort studies (observational studies) in orthopaedic literature, it is remarkable that there is currently no validated measurement tool to appraise their quality. A Delphi approach was used to develop a checklist for reporting quality, methodological quality and generalizability of case series and cohorts in total hip and total knee arthroplasty with a focus on aseptic loosening.
Methods: A web-based Delphi was conducted consisting of two internal rounds and three external rounds in order to achieve expert consensus on items considered relevant for reporting quality, methodological quality and generalizability.
Results: The internal rounds were used to construct a master list. The first external round was completed by 44 experts, 35 of them completed the second external round and 33 of them completed the third external round. Consensus was reached on an 8-item reporting quality checklist, a 6-item methodological checklist and a 22-item generalizability checklist.
Conclusions: Checklist for reporting quality, methodological quality and generalizability for case series and cohorts in total hip and total knee arthroplasty were successfully created through this Delphi. These checklists should improve the accuracy, completeness and quality of case series and cohorts regarding total hip and total knee arthroplasty.

• 出版日期2011-7-22